La presencia docente como determinante de la presencia cognitiva en un curso Blended Learning basado en la Comunidad de Indagación

Authors

  • Julio Erick Medina López Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas
  • Héctor Martínez Ruíz Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro
  • Ezra Federico Parra González Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas A. C. Unidad Zacatecas. Parque Quantum, CP 98160. Zacatecas, Zacatecas, México
  • Jezreel Mejía Miranda Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas A. C. Unidad Zacatecas. Parque Quantum, CP 98160. Zacatecas, Zacatecas, México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32870/recibe.v12i1.292

Keywords:

Blended Learning, Teaching Presence, Cognitive presence, Community of inquiry

Abstract

This paper presents the results of the analysis of the influence of teaching presence on cognitive presence in a Blended Learning course. The Community of Inquiry model was used as a reference, which is a constructivist approach for the design of educational experiences that integrates three types of presence: teaching presence, social presence and cognitive presence. A Blended Learning course was designed for a subject at the Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas. The methodology employed included the validation and application of the Community of Inquiry scale to obtain the perception of the three presences in the course design, and a correlational analysis was performed to determine the influence of teaching presence (instructional design, discourse facilitation and direct instruction) on the perception of cognitive presence. The results show a strong relationship between teaching presence and cognitive presence (r=0.771, p=0.000), indicating a significant correlation. In addition, a significant relationship was found between elements of teaching presence and cognitive presence. These findings confirm the importance of careful and advance planning of the course is critical to ensure the success of the Community of Inquiry in the context of Blended Learning in higher education.

References

Adini, M. H., Purba, H. S. and Sukmawati, R. A. (2017). The Development of Blended Learning Model Using Wordpress. 5th SEA-DR (South East Asia Development Research) International Conference 2017 (SEADRIC 2017). https://doi.org/10.2991/seadric-17.2017.45

Barberà, E., Romiszowski, A., Sangrà, A. and Simonson, M. (2006). Educación Abierta y a Distancia.

Bersin, J. (2004). The Blended Learning Book Best. 351.

Burns, M. (2011). Distance Education for Teacher Training: Modes, Models, and Methods. 338. http://idd.edc.org/sites/idd.edc.org/files/Distance Education for Teacher Training by Mary Burns EDC.pdf

Castellanos-Reyes, D. (2020). 20 Years of the Community of Inquiry Framework. TechTrends, 64(4), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00491-7

Cleveland., M. and Wilton, D. (2018). Guide to Blended Learning.

Dempsey, P. R. and Zhang, J. (2019). Re-examining the construct validity and causal relationships of teaching, cognitive, and social presence in community of inquiry framework. Online Learning Journal, 23(1), 62–79. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1419

Fillip, B. (2001). Distance Education in Central America and the Caribean. https://www.utsc.utoronto.ca/~chan/istb01/readings/distanceEdpdf

Fiock, H. S. (2020). View of Designing a Community of Inquiry in Online Courses | The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 1–19.

Gagné, R., Briggs, L. and Wager, W. (1992). Principles of Instructional Design.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T. and Archer, W. (2000). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T. and Archer, W. (2010). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003

Garrison, R. (2017). E-Learning in the 21st Century.

Hofman, J. (2018). What works in talent developement: Blended Learning.

Horn, M. B. and Staker, H. (2015). Blended: Using Disruptive Innovation to Improve Schools (Wiley (ed.)).

Joo, Y. J., Lim, K. Y. and Kim, E. K. (2011). Online university students’ satisfaction and persistence: Examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model. Computers and Education, 57(2), 1654–1664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.008

Medina, J. E., Martínez, H. and Sánchez, L. I. (2022). Validación de la escala de Comunidad de Indagación para la evaluación del Blended Learning. Transdigital, 3(6), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.56162/transdigital131

Mendoza, F. J. and Abaunza, O. M. (2005). La mediación pedagógica: una nueva perspectiva en la formación de valores educativos. Humanidades: La Ética En El Inicio Del Siglo XXI, 1–11.

Meydanlioglu, A. and Arikan, F. (2014). Effect of Hybrid Learning in Higher Education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 8(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.4018/jicte.2007040101

Mohammad, A., Al-iessa, A. H. K. A. and Afrouz, M. (2023). Relationship between Iraqi EFL Students ’ Perceptions of Community of Inquiry and their Attention and Engagement in Online Classes. 17(1), 227–255. http://tel.journal.org

Montes, A., Ochoa, J., Juaréz, B., Vasquez, M. and Díaz, C. (2021). Aplicación del coeficiente de correlación de Spearman en un estudio de fisioterpia. Cuerpo Académico de Probabilidad y Estadistica BUAP, 1–4. https://www.fcfm.buap.mx/SIEP/2021/Extensos Carteles/Extenso Juliana.pdf

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Inmigrants. On The Horizon, 9. https://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky - Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants - Part1.pdf

Rao, K., Edelen, P. and Cat, W. (2015). Universal design for online courses: applying principles to pedagogy. Open Learning, 30(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2014.991300

Romero, J., Roca, C., Sanjuán, A. and Pulido, A. (2014). DISEÑO DE UN APRENDIZAJE ADAPTADO A LAS NECESIDADES DEL ALUMNO 1 Melchor GARCÍA-DOMÍNGUEZ. Tesi, 15(3), 1–255.

Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M. and Zvacek, S. (2015). Teaching and Learning at a Distance (Sixth Edition). http://learning.fon.edu.mk/knigi/teachinganlearningatadistance-4.pdf

Stein, J. and Graham, C. R. (2014). Orientation to Blended Teaching and Learning. In Routledge (Ed.), Essentials for Blended Learning (p. 22).

Toboso, S., Tello, I. and Alvarez, F. J. (2017). Formación musical universitaria en un contexto de ensenanza blended-learmg. Revista Espanola de Pedagogia, 75(268), 497–515. https://doi.org/10.22550/REP75-3-2017-02

UNESCO. (n.d.). Distance Education. https://inee.org/eie-glossary/distance-education#:~:text=Distance education is an educational,and time from the learner.

Wiley, D. (2006). Innovative Teaching & Learning Strategies (Course/Program Level). A National Dialogue: The Secretary of Education’s Commission On The Future Of Higher Education. http://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/2005/09/09192005.html

Zainol, Z., Zahari, M. O. I. M., Mazlan, M. H. and Kadir, H. M. S. @ A. (2018). Digital disruption in higher eearning Education: The implementation of blended learning for undergraduates. Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 10(3), 579–588.

Published

2023-06-26

How to Cite

Medina López, J. E., Martínez Ruíz, H., Parra González, E. F., & Mejía Miranda, J. . (2023). La presencia docente como determinante de la presencia cognitiva en un curso Blended Learning basado en la Comunidad de Indagación. ReCIBE, Electronic Journal of Computing, Informatics, Biomedical and Electronics, 12(1), C4–13. https://doi.org/10.32870/recibe.v12i1.292

Issue

Section

Computer Science & IT